Welcome to the new TransLegal Digest
Welcome to the new TransLegal Digest, the world’s only online magazine dedicated to building and sharpening Legal English skills.
The Digest is a multimedia Legal English reader comprised of articles on current issues and trends in the law and unique features on various aspects of Legal English designed to build and sharpen your active Legal English vocabulary. TransLegal has selected the key vocabulary and provided practical, easy to understand definitions, usage tips, and pronunciation guides.
A limited selection of Digest content is available free. However, to access the full Digest, including archives you must subscribe.
The Legal English 500™ Self-Assessment Test is a free 25-question test based on the vocabulary of our Legal English 500™ (”LE-500″) course and is intended to determine whether the LE-500 course is appropriate for you. [read more]
Directors and officers have a fiduciary relationship with the corporation, resulting in a duty of care to avoid harm to the corporation, a duty of loyalty by placing the corporation’s interests ahead of their own as well as a duty of good faith and in some states a duty of candor. In accordance to the duty of care, corporate officers have a duty to inform themselves, prior to making a business decision, of all material information reasonably available to them. They then are to act with requisite care in the discharge of their duties. This duty of care is judged under a gross negligence standard.1 Courts have defined gross negligence as “reckless indifference to or a deliberate disregard of the whole body of stockholders” or actions that are “without the bounds of reason.”2 The courts look at whether the directors have acted with reasonable diligence and in good faith and whether any conflict of interest was involved. The business judgment rule insulates an officer or director from liability for a business decision. The decision must be made in good faith, she must be informed to the extent she reasonably believes appropriate under circumstances, and rationally believe that the decision is in the best interests of a corporation.3 [read more]
In commercial transactions, one worry common to both buyers and sellers is the unexpected costs that may arise after closing. To avoid these types of problems the parties may elect to set forth ground rules in the Sales Purchase Agreement (“SPA”) in the form of a basket and cap (sometimes cap and basket) provision. [read more]